Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/989
Title: Mitochondrial Molecular Basis of Sevoflurane and Propofol Cardioprotection in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement with Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Authors: Jovic, M.
Stancic, A.
Nenadic, D.
Cekic, O.
Nezic, D.
Milojevic, P.
Micovic, S.
Buzadzic, B.
Korać, Aleksandra 
Otasevic, V.
Jankovic, A.
Vucetic, M.
Veličković, Ksenija 
Golić, Igor 
Korać, Bato 
Keywords: Sevoflurane;Propofol;Mitochondria;Ischemia/reperfusion;Cardioprotection
Issue Date: 2012
Project: White or/and brown: importance of adipose tissue in overall redox dependent metabolic control in physiological adaptations and metabolic disorders (173055)
Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species functions in reproduction: possible pharmacological tools to treat human infertility (173054)
Journal: Cell Physiol Biochem 2012; 29:131-142.
Abstract: 
Background/Aims: Study elucidates and compares the mitochondrial bioenergetic-related molecular basis of sevoflurane and propofol cardioprotection during aortic valve replacement surgery due to aortic valve stenosis. Methods: Twenty-two patients were prospectively randomized in two groups regarding the anesthetic regime: sevoflurane and propofol. Hemodynamic parameters, biomarkers of cardiac injury and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. In tissue samples, taken from the interventricular septum, key mitochondrial molecules were determined by Western blot, real time PCR, as well as confocal microscopy and immunohisto- and immunocyto-chemical analysis. Results: The protein levels of cytochrome c oxidase and ATP synthase were higher in sevoflurane than in propofol group. Nevertheless, cytochrome c protein content was higher in propofol than sevoflurane receiving patients. Propofol group also showed higher protein level of connexin 43 (Cx43) than sevoflurane group. Besides, immunogold analysis showed its mitochondrial localization. The mRNA level of mtDNA and uncoupling protein (UCP2) were higher in propofol than sevoflurane patients, as well. On the other hand, there were no significant differences between groups in hemodynamic assessment, intensive care unit length of stay, troponin I and BNP level. Conclusions: Our data indicate that sevoflurane and propofol lead to cardiac protection via different mitochondrially related molecular mechanisms. It appears that sevoflurane acts regulating cytochrome c oxidase and ATP synthase, while the effects of propofol occur through regulation of cytochrome c, Cx43, mtDNA transcription and UCP2.
URI: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/989
DOI: 10.1159/000337594
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

35
checked on May 13, 2024

Page view(s)

11
checked on May 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.