Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/7205
Title: Comparison of the ABC and ACMG systems for variant classification
Authors: Houge, Gunnar
Bratland, Eirik
Aukrust, Ingvild
Tveten, Kristian
Žukauskaitė, Gabrielė
Sansovic, Ivona
Brea-Fernández, Alejandro J
Mayer, Karin
Paakkola, Teija
McKenna, Caoimhe
Wright, William
Keckarević-Marković, Milica 
Lildballe, Dorte L
Konecny, Michal
Smol, Thomas
Alhopuro, Pia
Gouttenoire, Estelle Arnaud
Obeid, Katharina
Todorova, Albena
Jankovic, Milena
Lubieniecka, Joanna M
Stojiljkovic, Maja
Buisine, Marie-Pierre
Haukanes, Bjørn Ivar
Lorans, Marie
Roomere, Hanno
Petit, François M
Haanpää, Maria K
Beneteau, Claire
Pérez, Belén
Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana
Rath, Matthias
Fuhrmann, Nico
Ferreira, Bibiana I
Stephanou, Coralea
Sjursen, Wenche
Maver, Aleš
Rouzier, Cécile
Chirita-Emandi, Adela
Gonçalves, João
Kuek, Wei Cheng David
Broly, Martin
Haer-Wigman, Lonneke
Thong, Meow-Keong
Tae, Sok-Kun
Hyblova, Michaela
den Dunnen, Johan T
Laner, Andreas
Issue Date: 22-May-2024
Rank: M21
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Journal: European journal of human genetics : EJHG
Abstract: 
The ABC and ACMG variant classification systems were compared by asking mainly European clinical laboratories to classify variants in 10 challenging cases using both systems, and to state if the variant in question would be reported as a relevant result or not as a measure of clinical utility. In contrast to the ABC system, the ACMG system was not made to guide variant reporting but to determine t...
URI: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/7205
ISSN: 10184813
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01617-8
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Mar 27, 2025

Page view(s)

18
checked on Mar 28, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.