Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4637
Title: Biocompatibility and Antibacterial Potential of the Cinnamomum camphora cineoliferum (L.) J. Presl. and Melaleuca ericifolia Sm.
Other Titles: Essential Oils Against Facultative and Obligate Endodontic Anaerobes
Authors: Marinkovic, Jelena
Markovic, Tatjana
Nikolić, Biljana 
Ciric, Ana
Mitić-Ćulafić, Dragana 
Đukanović, Stefana 
Krstić, A.
Pavlica D.
Vlajić, T.
Markovic, D.
Keywords: Anaerobes;Antibacterial;Biocompatibility;Essential oils;Tooth
Issue Date: 16-Mar-2022
Rank: M22
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Online
Citation: Marinković, J., Marković, T., Nikolić, B., Ćirić, A., Mitić-Ćulafić, D., Dukanović, S., Krstić, A., Pavlica, D., Vlajić, T., Markovic, D. (2022) Biocompatibility and antibacterial activity of the Cinnamomum camphora cineoliferum (L.) J.Presl. and Melaleuca ericifolia Sm. essential oils against facultative and obligate endodontic anaerobes, Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants, 25, 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2022.2040386.
Abstract: 
The aim of the study was to investigate the potency of Cinnamomum camphora cineoliferum and Melaleuca ericifolia essential oils (EOs) against facultative and obligate anaerobes isolated from teeth’ infected root canals. Biocompatibility of the EOs was also in the study focus. Chemical composition of the EOs was determined by GC/MS analysis. Their antibacterial potential and cytotoxicity were evaluated by microdilution and MTT assays, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t-test and one way ANOVA. Two the most abundant constituents of C. camphora cineoliferum EO were 1,8-cineole and sabinene, while in M. ericifolia EO the dominant were linalool and 1,8-cineole. MICs achieved against all tested strains were in the ranges 0.95±0.50 - 22.50±0.00 mg/mL and 0.65±0.00 - 23.35±7.80 mg/mL for the C. camphora cioneoliferum and M. ericifolia EOs, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that response to both oils has not differed between facultative and obligate anaerobes. Sensitivity pattern of the tested strains was different for the EOs and the positive control triple antibiotic paste (TAP): while E. faecalis and certain strains of S. salivarius were among the most sensitive to the oils, they were the least susceptible to the conventional antimicrobial TAP. Although the observed cytotoxicity of the EOs after 30 min of cell exposition was high (50.78-66.35% and up to 70% for C. camphora cioneoliferum and M. ericifolia EOs, respectively) it was lower than that of positive control (1.5% NaOCl, p<0.05). To conclude, both EOs showed promising antibacterial potential and achieved at least the same or even better biocompatibility than the conventional intracanal antimicrobials. Obtained results strongly encourage future research with an aim to formulate C. camphora cioneoliferum and M. ericifolia EO- based irrigants and medicaments, that could be used in endodontic practice
URI: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4637
ISSN: 0972-060X
0976-5026
DOI: 10.1080/0972060X.2022.2040386
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Apr 29, 2024

Page view(s)

25
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.