Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/8336
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPetrović, Marijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBez, Cristinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJanakiev, Tamaraen_US
dc.contributor.authorKruščić, Katarinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBertani, Irisen_US
dc.contributor.authorĆurčić, Živkoen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuduk, Natašaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuduk, Bojanen_US
dc.contributor.authorVenturi, Vittorioen_US
dc.contributor.authorDimkić, Ivicaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-11T07:28:55Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-11T07:28:55Z-
dc.date.issued2026-09-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/8336-
dc.description.abstractSugar beet production in Serbia is increasingly threatened by the combined effects of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ and Macrophomina phaseolina, a pathogen pair known to interact synergistically and cause severe root rot. To evaluate whether tailored microbial consortia can improve plant performance and stabilize the microbiome under these pressures, we tested three multi-strain inoculants (Mix1, Mix2, and Mix3) in pot and semi-field conditions. In pot experiments, Mix2 enhanced above-ground biomass, while Mix3 maintained or increased microbial diversity over time. Colonization assays and metabarcoding revealed clear differences in strain persistence, with P. polymyxa C3–36, C. pusillum ED2–6 and several Bacillus spp. establishing most consistently. Phytoplasma infection markedly reduced the native root microbiota of sugar beet, indicating a strong disruption of the natural root-associated microbial community. In response, Skermanella and Blastococcus were enriched in root tissues, while Mix3 treatment notably altered the root microbial profile by enriching oligotrophic and soil-stable taxa such as ‘Candidatus Udaeobacter’, ‘Candidatus Solibacter’, Gemmatimonas, and Acidobacteria-associated lineages (e.g., RB41, Vicinamibacterales). In the rhizosphere, sugar beet actively recruited Arthrobacter and Blastococcus, whereas bacterial inoculation with Mix3 led to the enrichment of Pseudarthrobacter, Kozakia, and Streptomyces in response to phytoplasma infection. Collectively, these results highlight a stress-responsive and compartment-specific modulation of microbiome assembly driven by both phytoplasma infection and bacterial treatment, although further optimization is required to counteract phytoplasma–M. phaseolina–driven decline.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofMicrobiological Researchen_US
dc.subjectMicrobiome stability;en_US
dc.subjectSugar beet;en_US
dc.subjectMacrophomina phaseolina;en_US
dc.subjectCandidatus Phytoplasma solani;en_US
dc.subjectPlant–microbe interactions.en_US
dc.titleDevelopment of bioformulations for sugar beet growth promotion and resilience using tailored microbial consortiaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.micres.2026.128540-
dc.description.rankM21aen_US
dc.description.impact6.9en_US
dc.relation.issn0944-5013en_US
dc.description.volume310en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptChair of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology-
crisitem.author.deptChair of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology-
crisitem.author.deptChair of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-3933-9610-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4703-3016-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0425-5938-
crisitem.author.parentorgInstitute of Physiology and Biochemistry "Ivan Djaja"-
crisitem.author.parentorgInstitute of Physiology and Biochemistry "Ivan Djaja"-
crisitem.author.parentorgInstitute of Physiology and Biochemistry "Ivan Djaja"-
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

5
checked on Nov 10, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.