Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/7437
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSava Ledjanacen_US
dc.contributor.authorFatjon Hoxhaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJasnić, Nebojšaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAleksandra Tasićen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarko Jovanovićen_US
dc.contributor.authorSlavica Blagojevićen_US
dc.contributor.authorNada Plavšaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTomislav Tostien_US
dc.contributor.editorSimona Sagonaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-21T10:52:54Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-21T10:52:54Z-
dc.date.issued2024-11-20-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/7437-
dc.description.abstractBeeswax is one of the most important products for the well-being of bee colonies. The wax glands of young worker bees produce beeswax, which serves as a building material for honeycomb construction. Beekeepers using hives with mobile frames mainly utilize local beeswax to make foundations. Any paraffin addition represents adulteration, resulting in a high degree of contamination. During the preparation of re-used beeswax, losses during the process may instigate producers to add cheaper, wax-like substances like paraffin and tallow. This article presents a systematic investigation of the quality of beeswax foundation from six major producers in Vojvodina, Serbia, by applying the classic analytical procedure for the determination of selected physicochemical parameters and instrumental gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflection (FTIR–ATR) spectroscopy techniques. FTIR–ATR detected possible paraffin and beef tallow in 72 foundation sheet samples. This technique was complemented with GC–MS. This analysis revealed that paraffin content ranged between 19.75 and 85.68%, while no tallow was detected over the two-year period. Two sheets from each manufacturer were placed into wired Langstroth–Ruth frames and placed in beehives. The construction, based on built cells, was monitored every 24 h. Evaluating newly inserted sheets proved that without quality nectar, there is no intensive building, regardless of adulteration.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation451-03-65/2024-03/200178en_US
dc.relation451-03-66/2024-03/200026en_US
dc.relation451-03-66/2024-03/200051en_US
dc.relation451-03-65/2024-03/200161en_US
dc.subjectbee’s colonyen_US
dc.subjectacceptabilityen_US
dc.subjecthoneycomben_US
dc.subjectbeeswaxen_US
dc.subjectparaffinen_US
dc.titleThe Influence of the Chemical Composition of Beeswax Foundation Sheets on Their Acceptability by the Bee’s Colonyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.3390/molecules29235489-
dc.description.rankM21en_US
dc.description.impact4.2en_US
dc.description.volume29en_US
dc.description.issue23en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptChair of Comparative Physiology and Ecophysiology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0333-333X-
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

4
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.