Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/7370
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiangen_US
dc.contributor.authorDong, Zhaokeen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, Qiongen_US
dc.contributor.authorGagic, Vesnaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTomanović, Željkoen_US
dc.contributor.authorZalucki, Myron P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLu, Zhaozhien_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-05T08:35:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-05T08:35:35Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-01-
dc.identifier.issn01718177-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/7370-
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding how landscape composition and configuration drive the dynamics of pests and their various natural enemies is crucial to enhance biological control services (biocontrol). Geographic variability in landscape effects prompts questions about whether this is due to genuine differences or methodological differences among studies, given that most studies are conducted in a single region. This study investigated how the ecological function of parasitoids and predators responds to landscape traits in three regions encompassing an agriculture intensification gradient. The effects of landscape structure and configuration differed among regions and natural enemies. Non-crop habitats increased the abundance of parasitoids only in two less intensified regions presumably due to insufficient amount of non-crop habitats in the intensified region (typically < 10%). Nevertheless, their biological control efficiency (BCE) was consistently increased by non-crop habitats across regions. Higher maize proportion increased predator abundance and their BCE in the two non-mountainous regions. The value of maize as a source habitat for predators may have been limited in the mountainous region due to the lower aphid abundances there. Edge density positively affected abundances of predators and parasitoids, but only positively increased the BCE of all natural enemies combined. Inconsistent regional responses to the same landscape variables suggest that a uniform integrated pest management strategy for alfalfa is impractical. However, increasing edge density should be a useful first step for supporting diverse natural enemy communities and their biocontrol potential.en_US
dc.publisherE. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlungen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEntomologia Generalisen_US
dc.subjectbiocontrol efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectedge densityen_US
dc.subjectlandscape traiten_US
dc.subjectparasitoiden_US
dc.subjectpredatoren_US
dc.titleLandscape structure and composition affect aphid biological control in alfalfa fields, but regional differences prevailen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1127/entomologia/2023/2320-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85201944210-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85201944210-
dc.description.rankM21aen_US
dc.description.impact6.9en_US
dc.description.startpage535en_US
dc.description.endpage544en_US
dc.relation.issn0171-8177en_US
dc.description.volume44en_US
dc.description.issue3en_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptChair of Invertebrate Zoology and Entomology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5063-5480-
crisitem.author.parentorgInstitute of Zoology-
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

10
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.