Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3947
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFilipic, Brankicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNikolic, Katarinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFilipic, Slavicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJovčić, Brankoen_US
dc.contributor.authorAgbaba, Danicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAntic Stankovic, Jelenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKojic, Milanen_US
dc.contributor.authorGolic, Natasaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-16T12:51:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-16T12:51:39Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn1876-1070-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3947-
dc.description.abstractThe CmbT substrate specificity and its role as a proton motive force-driven drug efflux pump at a molecular level were investigated in the study. In that order, 3D-quantitative structure–activity relationship (3D-QSAR) study was applied for selection of molecular determinants of multidrug recognition by CmbT. CmbT multidrug resistance protein of Lactococcus lactis contributes to extruding the structurally, chemically, and pharmacologically diverse range of substrates out of bacterial cells. This function of CmbT may result in the failure of antibiotic therapy. Homology model of CmbT protein was constructed and further optimized. The 3D-QSAR model predictive potential was proved by use of leave-one-out cross validation of the training set (Q2: 0.69, R2 Observed vs: Predicted : 0:918; RMSEE: 0.193) and verification set (R2 Observed vs: Predicted : 0:704; RMSEP: 0.289). The results obtained in this study showed that high CmbT affinities to ethidium, sulbactam, and sulfathiazole could be related to the absence of significant unfavourable interactions. In contrast, the presence of specific unfavourable interaction between two hydrogen bond donor groups in bacitracin, apramycin, novobiocin, vancomycin, kanamycin, gentamycin, and tobramycin is found to be the main reason for their lower CmbT affinities. In addition, membrane position of the CmbT binding site and positive correlation between substrates lipophilicity (log DpH 5.0) and CmbT affinity strongly indicates that CmbT recognizes its substrates within the membrane.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries45(2014);764-771-
dc.subjectCmbTen_US
dc.subjectMultidrug resistanceen_US
dc.subjectMFS general substrate transporteren_US
dc.subjectLactococcus lactisen_US
dc.subjectQSARen_US
dc.titleIdentifying the CmbT substrates specificity by using a quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtice.2013.09.033-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptChair of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9500-3786-
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please
Filipic et al 2014 JTICE.pdf2.32 MBAdobe PDF
    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Nov 17, 2024

Page view(s)

2
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.