Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2524
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCuturilo, Goranen_US
dc.contributor.authorMenten, Björnen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrstic, Aleksandaren_US
dc.contributor.authorDrakulic, Danijelaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJovanovic, Idaen_US
dc.contributor.authorParezanovic, Vojislaven_US
dc.contributor.authorStevanović, Milenaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-24T16:49:44Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-24T16:49:44Z-
dc.date.issued2011-11-
dc.identifier.issn0340-6199-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2524-
dc.description.abstractSmall terminal or interstitial deletions involving bands 4q34 and 4q35 have been described in several patients with a relatively mild phenotype such as mild to moderate intellectual disability and minor dysmorphic features. We present a boy born from unrelated parents with a de novo 4q34.1-q35.2 deletion and clinical features resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported patient with 4q34-q35 deletion and phenotype resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndrome without fifth finger anomalies as a specific feature of 4q- syndrome. G-banding karyotyping disclosed the deletion, which was further delineated by microarray comparative genomic hybridization. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analyses did not reveal rearrangements of 22q11.2 region. MLPA confirmed the deletion within the 4q35.2 region. Conclusion: Given the considerable clinical overlaps between the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and clinical manifestation of the patient described in this study, we propose that region 4q34.1-q35.2 should be considered as another region associated with phenotype resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. We also propose that distal 4q deletions should be considered in the evaluation of patients with phenotypic manifestations resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in whom no 22q11.2 microdeletion was detected, even in the absence of distinctive fifth finger anomalies. Additionally, we underline the importance of applying array CGH that enables simultaneous genome-wide detection and delineation of copy number changes (e.g., deletions and duplications). © 2011 Springer-Verlag.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Pediatricsen_US
dc.subject22q11.2 deletion syndromeen_US
dc.subject4q34.1-q35.2 deletionen_US
dc.subjectArray CGHen_US
dc.subjectMLPAen_US
dc.title4q34.1-q35.2 deletion in a boy with phenotype resembling 22q11.2 deletion syndromeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00431-011-1533-3-
dc.identifier.pmid21833498-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-82655173964-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/82655173964-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptChair of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4286-7334-
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please
cuturilo2011EurJPediatr.pdf163.83 kBAdobe PDF
    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
checked on Nov 17, 2024

Page view(s)

2
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.