Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1607
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDingemanse, Walter B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGielen, Ingrid M.L.V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Bree, Henri J.J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMüller-Gerbl, Magdalenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrstić, Nikola E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMitrović, Marko B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorĆirović, Duškoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLazarević Macanović, Mirjana V.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-09T10:31:32Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-09T10:31:32Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn0932-0814-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1607-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart New York. Objective Subchondral bone density distribution can be used to study joint biomechanics non-invasively. Differences in joint loading between related species can aid in the understanding of joint loading and the development of certain types of orthopaedic pathology. This study was conducted to evaluate density distribution in the subchondral bone of the talus of different Canidae species, as a parameter reflecting the long-term joint loading in the tarsocrural joint. Materials and Methods The tarsal joints of cadaveric dogs of different breeds were included, that is, German Shepherd (n = 5), Bouvier des Flandres (n = 3) and Labrador Retriever (n = 6). Additionally, golden jackals (n = 5) (Canis aureus) and wolves (n = 5) (Canis lupus) were included. Consecutive computed tomography slices were made and the subchondral bone density distribution was evaluated using computer tomographic osteoabsorptiometry. Different breeds and species were visually compared. Results Differences were found in the subchondral bone density distribution of the talus between breeds and between species (Canis familiaris, Canis lupus and Canis aureus). Discussion and Conclusion Based on the density distribution, there are differences in loading conditions of the tarsocrural joint in different species of Canidae. The joint loading distribution is very similar between dogs of the same breed and within the same species. Although between-breed differences can be explained by conformational differences, the between-species differences remain subject to further research.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatologyen_US
dc.subjectCanidaeen_US
dc.subjectcomputed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectcomputer tomographic osteoabsorptiometryen_US
dc.subjectdogsen_US
dc.subjectjackalen_US
dc.subjectjoint biomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectsubchondral bone densityen_US
dc.subjectwolfen_US
dc.titleSpatial Subchondral Bone Density Reflecting Joint Loading of the Talus in Different Canidaeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0039-1685511-
dc.identifier.pmid30965371-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85065877700-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85065877700-
dc.description.rankM22-
dc.description.impact1.453-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptChair of Animal Ecology and Zoogeography-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9468-0948-
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.