Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1442
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSunjog, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKolarević, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHéberger, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGacić, Z.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKnezević-Vukčević, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVuković-GaCić, B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLenhardt, M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-26T10:38:44Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-26T10:38:44Z-
dc.date.issued2013-03-25-
dc.identifier.issn1618-2642-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biore.bio.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1442-
dc.description.abstractThe genotoxic potential of waters in six rivers and reservoirs from Serbia was monitored in different tissues of chub (Squalius cephalus L. 1758) with the alkaline comet assay. The comet assay, or single-cell gel electrophoresis, has a wide application as a simple and sensitive method for evaluating DNA damage in fish exposed to various xenobiotics in the aquatic environment. Three types of cells, erythrocytes, gill cells, and liver cells, were used for assessing DNA damage. Images of randomly selected cells were analyzed with a Leica fluorescence microscope and image analysis by software (Comet Assay IV Image analysis system, PI, UK). Three parameters (tail length-l, tail intensity-i, and Olive tail moment-m) were analyzed on 1,700 nuclei per cell type. The procedure for sum of ranking differences (SRD) was implemented to compare different types of cells and different parameters for estimation of DNA damage. Regarding our nine different estimations of genotoxicity: tail length, intensity, and moment in erythrocytes (rel, rei, rem), liver cells (rll, rli, rlm), and gill cells (rgl, rgi, rgm), the SRD procedure has shown that the Olive tail moment and tail intensity are (almost) equally good parameters; the SRD value was lower for the tail moment and tail intensity than for tail length in the case of all types of cells. The least reliable parameter was rel; close to the borderline case were rei, rll, and rgl (5 % probability of random ranking). © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnalytical and Bioanalytical Chemistryen_US
dc.subjectComet assayen_US
dc.subjectParametersen_US
dc.subjectOrderingen_US
dc.subjectFluorescenceen_US
dc.subjectEcogenotoxicityen_US
dc.subjectComparisonen_US
dc.titleComparison of comet assay parameters for estimation of genotoxicity by sum of ranking differencesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00216-013-6909-y-
dc.identifier.pmid23525541-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84891674711-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84891674711-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

37
checked on Sep 26, 2024

Page view(s)

2
checked on Sep 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.